There, I said it. I support Donald Trump for president. Not that I care particularly for him as a candidate; I don't. Not that I think a Republican would be significantly different than a Democrat; I don't. Not that Donald Trump has shown significant insight or deep understanding of the issues; he hasn't.
No, it's pretty simple: the kinds of people I loathe in national politics simply hate Donald Trump. That means there must be something there, and, even if there isn't, it will send a definite signal if Donald Trump achieves the presidency: the people are angry.
The average voter does not have the inclination nor the time to understand what is going on in the world. Indeed, the world is so large and chaotic that no group of dedicated persons, even those in the Bureau, have the slightest chance of understanding everything. Therefore, the average voter uses a rule of thumb to decide on an election. In this election, that rule of thumb is that they are tired of the establishment screwing around and robbing us blind.
There are other reasons. Trump actually has a point when he says nobody outside of America really respects Obama, and that mantle of disrespect would be assumed by Hillary were she to become president. Whether a strong personality should occupy the Oval Office or not, at least Trump does, indeed, possess a strong personality.
Then, there's the question of success. Whether or not Trump got his billions by righteous means, whatever those means are to you and yours, he did, indeed, get billions. By comparison, nobody else in the entire field is anywhere near as successful. This means Trump is, at least, minimally competent to run a large organization, something that cannot be said of Hillary, whose primary income is derived from speech giving and, apparently, influence peddling. As a matter of fact, Trump has, indeed, purchased influence from the Clintons.
And, finally, and, perhaps most tellingly, Trump basically cannot be bought. This is unique in recent memory. Prior to Trump, there simply has not been a candidate in my lifetime that was so situated and had a chance in the general election.
I do think Trump's heart is in the right place. I believe he's been watching the country veer towards authoritarianism, aided and abetted by petit dictators in both parties who would enforce their idea of heaven on the rest of us (exempting themselves, naturally) so that we could all live a 'better life' than we could achieve by our own efforts.
Given that, politically, I am a rather radical minarchist, I support Gary Johnson as being both the closest to me politically and the most likely to make any real change in governance. Since he's a Libertarian, he's not going to get the election at the moment, so, instead, I will help elect Donald Trump at the two main parties as a promise of further electoral revolt if they do not mend their ways and see to the simple pastime of making a government that operates smoothly and improves lives by not screwing them up.
No, it's pretty simple: the kinds of people I loathe in national politics simply hate Donald Trump. That means there must be something there, and, even if there isn't, it will send a definite signal if Donald Trump achieves the presidency: the people are angry.
The average voter does not have the inclination nor the time to understand what is going on in the world. Indeed, the world is so large and chaotic that no group of dedicated persons, even those in the Bureau, have the slightest chance of understanding everything. Therefore, the average voter uses a rule of thumb to decide on an election. In this election, that rule of thumb is that they are tired of the establishment screwing around and robbing us blind.
There are other reasons. Trump actually has a point when he says nobody outside of America really respects Obama, and that mantle of disrespect would be assumed by Hillary were she to become president. Whether a strong personality should occupy the Oval Office or not, at least Trump does, indeed, possess a strong personality.
Then, there's the question of success. Whether or not Trump got his billions by righteous means, whatever those means are to you and yours, he did, indeed, get billions. By comparison, nobody else in the entire field is anywhere near as successful. This means Trump is, at least, minimally competent to run a large organization, something that cannot be said of Hillary, whose primary income is derived from speech giving and, apparently, influence peddling. As a matter of fact, Trump has, indeed, purchased influence from the Clintons.
And, finally, and, perhaps most tellingly, Trump basically cannot be bought. This is unique in recent memory. Prior to Trump, there simply has not been a candidate in my lifetime that was so situated and had a chance in the general election.
I do think Trump's heart is in the right place. I believe he's been watching the country veer towards authoritarianism, aided and abetted by petit dictators in both parties who would enforce their idea of heaven on the rest of us (exempting themselves, naturally) so that we could all live a 'better life' than we could achieve by our own efforts.
Given that, politically, I am a rather radical minarchist, I support Gary Johnson as being both the closest to me politically and the most likely to make any real change in governance. Since he's a Libertarian, he's not going to get the election at the moment, so, instead, I will help elect Donald Trump at the two main parties as a promise of further electoral revolt if they do not mend their ways and see to the simple pastime of making a government that operates smoothly and improves lives by not screwing them up.
No comments:
Post a Comment